Deceived the whole world. Conflicting facts about Meghan Markle

From & nbsp; since Meghan Markle went from & nbsp; ordinary television actress at & nbsp; wife of Prince Harry and & nbsp; nbsp; became (albeit briefly) as a member of the royal family, we learned a lot about the & nbsp; Duchess of Sussex. On the occasion of & nbsp; birthday of the woman who immortalized her name with & nbsp; with the help of & nbsp; Megsit, AiF.ru recalls the facts of & nbsp; his & nbsp; biography.

1. A show for the whole world

It's no secret that even before meeting Prince Harry, the actress was married to Trevor Engelson. Now the media is calling the producer no & nbsp; otherwise as 'Meghan Markle's ex-husband', although once it was hard to imagine, as Megan's merits in & nbsp; cinema, to say the least, were not exceptional. But the relationship with the royal family made her a real celebrity.

The couple divorced in the summer of 2013 & nbsp; year. It was rumored that despite the break from & nbsp;, Megan continued to receive money from & nbsp; ex-lover and & nbsp; refused & nbsp; financial aid only when the whole world learned of the existence of & nbsp; his & nbsp; relationship with the & nbsp; prince. Thus, the marriage with the producer was the first for the actress. She then married & nbsp; Harry. We all got to watch their amazingly beautiful wedding ceremony on May 19, 2018 of the year. However, before & nbsp; her Markle made it down the aisle again. “ We got married & nbsp; three days before & nbsp; the wedding. Nobody & nbsp; do not know. We called the Archbishop and said: & nbsp; & bdquo; It is a spectacle for the whole world, and & nbsp; we want to enter into an alliance between us and & nbsp; for us & ldquo; & raquo ;, & nbsp; & mdash; said the actress in a & nbsp; interview with Oprah Winfrey.

During the secret ceremony, which took place in the backyard of the couple's home, there was no one there other than the lovers and the Archbishop of Canterbury, so what happened on & nbsp; May 19, 2018, indeed, can be called a 'play', after all, Harry and & nbsp; ; Meghan was already married.

2. So & nbsp; had not & nbsp; of relationship with & nbsp; father

& Nbsp; Megan has a wonderful relationship with & nbsp; mother Doria, but & nbsp; here with & nbsp; his own father Thomas & nbsp; none at all. After her parents' divorce, the future Duchess of Sussex has always kept in touch with & nbsp; Markle, but & nbsp; little by little it went to & nbsp; no. Even up to the altar, the actress was not led by & nbsp; Thomas (he was unable to attend the ceremony for health reasons), but by & nbsp; Prince Charles. Unsurprisingly, Meghan's dad never goes out with his grandchildren, even though the oldest Archie is two! “ Hope to see my grandchildren someday because I'm a pretty good grandfather '', & nbsp; & mdash; Thomas said in a & nbsp; interview with Australian show 60 & nbsp; Minutes. However, the & nbsp; less upset father is not going to give up: in an interview with Fox News, he said he was going to get the right to meet & nbsp; Archie and & nbsp; baby Lilibet by court. So the peace of Megan and & nbsp; Harry are only dreaming. Those close to the Duchess of Sussex, like no one else, know how to deliver her troubles to her.

3. Lived and & nbsp; lives on a & nbsp; big foot

To & nbsp; these & nbsp; eras when Harry and & nbsp; Megan was still performing their duties as a member of the royal family, reporters were closely monitoring & nbsp; & # 39; s appearance Markle, because the actress had not saved money for & nbsp; her outfits. According to the Daily Mail, the Duchess of Sussex's wardrobe on her tour of Oceania cost $ 238,789. Therefore, for & nbsp; Megan quickly established a reputation as a real spendthrift, which she has confirmed on several occasions, for example, with her American Baby Shower, which her famous friends Serena Williams and & nbsp; Amal Clooney were having fun. To & nbsp; States, Markle delivered a private jet, and & nbsp; upon arrival, the actress stopped in & nbsp; one of the & nbsp; most expensive hotels in New York.

Surprisingly, & nbsp; even after Harry and & nbsp; Meghan have stepped down as royalty, Markle's demands have not abated. She still lives on a & nbsp; big foot and & nbsp; do & nbsp; refuses & nbsp; expensive things. For example, when the prince's wife recorded a video message for the online event Vax Live, which aired on American television, she wore a Carolina Herrera dress for £ 1,200. But & nbsp; that's not all: journalists have just seen at & nbsp; Markle watches from the jewelry house Cartier valued at 17.8 thousand pounds sterling and bracelets from the same brand valued at 5000 and 2360 pounds sterling. Such an expensive outfit, according to the Daily Mail, angered many users, as Megan was asked to speak about the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on women, and did not show her level of wealth. .

4. Did you cheat on your grandmother?

The accusations of & nbsp; address Markle echoing incessantly. One of them was made by the author of several books on the royal family Penny Junor. The writer is sure that Harry and & nbsp; Megan weren't completely honest with & nbsp; Elizabeth & nbsp; II when they turned to & nbsp; her to agree on the name of their newborn daughter. They wanted to call the Lilibet girl “ Lily '' Diane. The child's first name has been given in & nbsp; honor of the house nickname of the great-grandmother, the second in & nbsp; honor of the grandmother & nbsp; & mdash; Princess Diana. Junor is sure that the agreements with the & nbsp; queen were formal in nature, the couple would have already decided everything before the conversation with & nbsp; Elizabeth II & nbsp; Thus, the & nbsp; on the day of the call, the address lilibetdiana.com was purchased, and & nbsp; before & nbsp; this May 31 & nbsp; a similar address has been registered & nbsp; & mdash; lilidiana.com. “ Prince Harry clearly hasn't consulted the & nbsp; queen & # 39; & # 39 ;, & nbsp; & mdash; quotes the Mirror journalist's words.

And & nbsp; after all, the couple's rep had previously reported that if Harry and & nbsp; Megan did not have received permission from the & nbsp; queen regarding her daughter's name, then the & nbsp; girl & nbsp; would not have received Lilibet's name. Somehow the baby has become 'Lily', by the way, according to the Daily Mail, her name recently appeared on the list of heirs to the throne on the official website of the king family.