Victims of thallium poisoning four years ago at the aircraft factory. G.M. Beriev in Taganrog is not satisfied with the court's decision, that the culprit Vladislav Shulga was sentenced to eight years in general prison.
Personal hostility
The incident took place in 2017 in the science and technology complex of Taganrog Aviation. G.M. Beriev (TANTK), where the Be-200 amphibious aircraft are produced. Thallium poisoned 34 people to varying degrees.
The investigation lasted four years, and ultimately the court found Vladislav Shulga, a resident of Taganrog, guilty of mass poisoning his colleagues.
Shulga served eight years in a general regime colony. The man was taken into custody in the courtroom, before he was released on an undertaking not to leave. & Nbsp;
The prosecution believes that, while working for TANTK, in 2017, “ on personal hostility towards several employees of the company '' adding thallium to 19 liter drinking water bottles. As a result, there was massive poisoning of the company's employees.
Shulga to the investigative experience. Screenshot
'At the initial stage of the investigation, Shulga confessed to the investigation. In the future, he changed the testimony given previously, declaring his innocence in the crimes & # 39 ;, & mdash; reported by the press service of the Investigative Department of the Investigative Committee of Russia for the Rostov region.
The Investigation Committee noted that during the investigation numerous petitions and complaints were investigated, “including allegedly illegal methods of conducting the investigation. 'Investigation', expert reviews and other investigative measures were carried out, which the court considered evidence of guilt.
“ According to the results of the chemical examinations, a chemical substance containing thallium was found in a bottle taken from the factory premises, and on a chemical scale taken from Shulga's home , & # 39; & # 39; & hyphen ; according to the press service of the department.
The court found Shulga guilty on the point 'it & # 39; & # 39; s h. 2 tbsp. 111 of the Criminal Code (intentionally inflicts grievous bodily harm), paragraph a; h. 2 tbsp. 112 of the Penal Code (intentionally inflicts moderate harm to health) and 1 Art. 115 of the Penal Code (intentionally inflicts minor damage to health).
There is not enough evidence
The victims are unhappy with the verdict. They defend the condemned. & Nbsp;
“We were in favor of an acquittal because, in our opinion, guilt has not been proven, & mdash; '' told AiF.ru the 39; victims' lawyer Valery Skorobogatov … & mdash; It is still unclear what caused the poisoning of 34 factory workers. The matter has not been fully investigated. Most likely, the part of Shulga will appeal. & # 39; & # 39;
The lawyer finds the court's evidence unconvincing.
“ According to the prosecutor's version, Shulga prepared three doses of the poison and poured them into three 19-liter bottles. As a result, he poisoned 34 people & mdash; those who drank water & mdash; explains Valery Skorobogatov. & mdash; Victims & mdash; they are employees of three departments, and they all sit in five offices. Each office has their own bottled water bottle that they drink from. That is, poison everyone & mdash; you don't need three, but five bottles. The question arises: how did people poison themselves. This point is not clear. & # 39; & # 39; & Nbsp;
According to the defender, the version of the poisoning is not confirmed, and it is not known how it could have happened.
One of the victims Inna Aleinikova agreed to speak to the correspondent of AiF.ru. Four years ago, internet users were shocked by a video in which a young and beautiful girl showed how her hair fell out.
“I quit my job, I continue to rebuild my health, it's a never-ending process, & mdash; said Inna Aleinikova. & mdash; Twice a year I definitely go to the hospital for checkup and procedures. & # 39; & # 39; & Nbsp;
In his opinion, the court did not take into account a lot of things, for example, it refused the victims & # 39; petitions.
Testimony under pressure
Three years ago, Shulga said he wrote an appeal on his case to the Human Rights Ombudsman ; man Tatiana Moskalkova . RBC reports that it complained about the actions of employees of the Interior Ministry of Taganrog and employees of the Investigations Directorate of the Rostov region Investigative Committee. Shulga claimed that at the end of March its “ no explanation '' was detained by police officers, after which the court sentenced him to seven days' arrest for petty hooliganism.
The man said an officer showed up at the temporary detention center, who threatened him and “ asked to take the blame & # 39; & # 39 ;; in case of poisoning at the Aircraft Company im. Berev. A factory worker also wrote in his appeal to Moskalkova that he confessed 'after psychological abuse' and threats to sue his mother.
